ATX · Service area

Austin

Development Services Department · Permitting and Development Center

Austin is the largest and most layered jurisdiction in the region, and the building permit is rarely the long pole. For most commercial and multifamily work the site plan controls the schedule, and the city publishes its review times as regularly updated data rather than fixed windows. Its city limits reach into Travis, Williamson and Hays Counties, so the county side of a project changes with the address.

  • Permitting and Development Center · 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr
  • Portal: Austin Build + Connect (AB+C)

In review Cleared Correction return Submittal assembled, ready for intake.

T-101 · Published review times

What the city publishes

Austin does something Georgetown and Round Rock do not: it publishes its current review times as data that the Development Services Department updates on an ongoing basis, rather than committing to fixed windows. We do not reprint those figures here because they change; we plan against the posted queue at the time of submittal.

Review typePublished windowMeasured from
Residential building plan reviewPosted as current review times, updated by DSDformal intake, after the completeness check
Commercial building plan reviewPosted as current review times, updated by DSDformal intake, after the completeness check
Site plan reviewPosted as current review times, per disciplinedisciplines review in parallel within the case
Expedited Building Plan ReviewPaid program with scheduled review sessionsavailability and fees published by DSD
Plat approval30 daysstatutory action deadline under state law

Source: City of Austin Development Services Department published review times, and Texas Local Government Code Chapter 212 for plat action. Confirm the current posted times before committing a schedule.

T-102 · Sequence

How the sequence stacks up

The same tenant program, in a shell that already has an approved site plan versus a site that needs one. Austin sequences most commercial and multifamily work through site plan approval before the building permit, so the choice of site is also a choice of approval path.

Finish-out in an approved shell building review only
New building needing a site plan site plan, then building
Active review Queued Correction round

Sequence per City of Austin Land Development Code, Title 25. Bar lengths show the order of operations, not durations; Austin publishes its current review times separately.

N-101 · Local notes

What controls the schedule here

The requirements specific to this jurisdiction that cost the most when they surface late.

  1. The site plan, not the building permit, usually controls the schedule

    Under the Land Development Code, Title 25, most commercial and multifamily development requires an approved site plan before a building permit can issue. Zoning, watershed protection, drainage, transportation and tree reviews all run inside the site plan case, and each discipline can generate its own comments. The most restrictive watershed rules apply in the Barton Springs Zone. On a raw site, the site plan is the critical path.

  2. Review times are published as live data, and the clock starts at intake

    The Development Services Department posts its current review turnarounds and updates them as workload changes. Applications pass a completeness check before formal intake, and the review clock runs from intake, not from the day the package was first uploaded to Austin Build + Connect. We plan schedules against the queue as posted at submittal.

  3. Austin operates a formal expedited program, unlike its northern neighbors

    Georgetown states outright that it offers no expediting option, and Round Rock publishes no expedited program. Austin does: the Expedited Building Plan Review program is a paid service that schedules building permit review with a dedicated team. Fees and availability are published by DSD, and it applies to building permit review, not to the site plan case in front of it.

  4. Trees are regulated citywide, and heritage trees can reshape a site plan

    Under Chapter 25-8 of the Land Development Code, removing a protected size tree, 19 inches in diameter and larger, requires a permit, and heritage trees, 24 inches and larger of the species the code lists, require a variance to remove unless the tree is dead, diseased or an imminent hazard. A tree survey belongs at the start of due diligence, not after the site plan is drawn.

  5. Two municipal utilities sit inside the approval path

    Austin Energy handles electric service design and line extensions on its own process and its own timeline. Austin Water issues taps, and where existing infrastructure does not reach the site, a Service Extension Request runs through its own review before the utility side is resolved. Both run in parallel with, not inside, the DSD review, and both belong on the schedule from day one.

F-101 · Fees

How Austin calculates fees

City fees are separate from ours and are paid to the jurisdiction. Austin adopts its fee schedules by fiscal year and publishes them, so figures printed here would go stale. These are the categories that belong in the pro forma.

Fee typeFee basis
Building permit and plan reviewDSD fee schedule, adopted each fiscal year
Site plan reviewDSD fee schedule, set by application type and scope
Water and wastewaterAustin Water tap and capital recovery fees, by meter size
Electric serviceAustin Energy service and line extension charges
Street impact feeSet by service area and land use, collected with the building permit
Parkland dedicationResidential development, land dedication or fee-in-lieu

Source: City of Austin fee schedules, adopted by fiscal year and published by the Development Services Department and the city utilities. Confirm the current fiscal-year schedule before budgeting.

N-102 · Areas we work in Austin

  • Downtown
  • The Domain
  • Mueller
  • East Austin
  • South Congress
  • East Riverside
  • St. Elmo
  • Montopolis
  • North Burnet
  • Zilker

J-100 · Other service areas

T-001 · Transmittal

Have a project that needs a path forward?

Evaluating a site, working through entitlements, preparing an application, responding to comments, or trying to move a project that has stalled. Tell us where it stands and we will map what comes next.